States › Georgia › Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharetta, GA › Georgia Career Institute › Personal & Culinary Services › Cosmetology and Related Personal Grooming Services.

Cosmetology and Related Personal Grooming Services.

Georgia Career Institute · Conyers, GA · CIP 1204 · Undergrad Certificate

DOE-modeled fail

DOE's public modeling data suggests this broad program grouping failed the earnings premium measure. This is based on the 4-digit CIP grouping level used in the rulemaking file — the actual rule would operate at the 6-digit level.

⚠ Data caution

This record reflects a 4-digit CIP grouping (1204) used in DOE's public modeling file. Actual enforcement under the proposed rule would operate at the 6-digit CIP level. The specific programs inside this grouping depend on institution-assigned CIP coding and may not map neatly to how Georgia Career Institute markets its majors.

Earnings data

Median earnings (yr 4 after completion)

$21,967

n=306

DOE earnings benchmark

$34,808

$12,841 below benchmark

Benchmark type

Not Listed in Section 84001

This CIP code is "Not Listed in Section 84001" of the benchmark statute. DOE uses the national high school median ($34,808) as the earnings benchmark rather than a field-specific or state-specific rate.

Program context

Enrollment & completion

Program enrollment

665 (2024–25)
517 (2023–24)

Completers

277 (2024–25)
318 (2023–24)

Non-completion rate

18.8%

110 non-completers (2022–23)

Completers with earnings data

306

used in DOE earnings test

Debt & financial aid

Median federal debt at graduation

$7,846

n=355

Loan recipients

464 (2024–25)
356 (2023–24)

Total loan volume

$2,583,513 (2024–25)
$1,692,269 (2023–24)

Pell recipients

541 (2024–25)
405 (2023–24)

Student demographics (2018–19 enrollment)

Women

97.3%

Black / African American

47.0%

Hispanic

4.6%

White

43.9%

Enrollment and financial aid data are from the PPD:2026 source files. Demographics reflect 2018–19 program enrollees. Privacy-suppressed values are not shown.

Story angle tags

for profit comparison

Reporting prompts

How many 6-digit programs sit inside CIP 1204 at this institution?
How does Georgia Career Institute map this CIP grouping to named majors?
Could similar-looking programs at peer institutions be coded differently?
What share of students in this program borrow? What is their typical debt load?
Do many completers pursue graduate school within four years?
Has the institution reviewed its own 6-digit program structure under the proposed rule?
How does the institution think this proposed rule would affect programs in this field?

Methodology

What PPD:2026 is: The Department of Education's Program Performance Data file, released as part of the 2026 rulemaking. It models program outcomes at the institution × credential × 4-digit CIP level.

Why modeled exposure is not a final result: These are modeled estimates from a single cohort snapshot. They cannot account for future appeals, teach-outs, institutional changes, or student behavior changes.

The 4-digit vs. 6-digit gap: The public file uses 4-digit CIP codes. The actual proposed rule would use 6-digit codes. About 83% of 4-digit CIPs contain only one 6-digit CIP, but the rest may contain many.

Institution-assigned CIP codes: Institutions assign CIP codes to their own programs. Similar majors at different colleges can be classified under different CIP codes, especially for interdisciplinary or area-studies programs.

Earnings measurement: Earnings are measured roughly four years after program completion, which may undercount lifetime earnings in fields with slower early-career income growth.

Benchmarks: Undergraduate programs are benchmarked against working adults aged 25–34 with only a high school diploma. Graduate programs use a more complex bachelor's-degree benchmark.

Plain-language summary (copy for notes)

DOE's public rulemaking file suggests the broad program grouping Cosmetology and Related Personal Grooming Services. (CIP 1204, Undergrad Certificate) at Georgia Career Institute carries a DOE-modeled fail designation under the proposed earnings-accountability rule. This grouping is defined at the institution × credential × 4-digit CIP level, while the actual proposal would operate at the 6-digit CIP level. This should be treated as a reporting lead rather than a definitive regulatory finding.